Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14600KF-$294
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 219
2-Core 440
131% 251 Pts
4-Core 883
8-Core 1,447
142% 1,165 Pts
64-Core 2,524
156% 2,524 Pts
Poor: 119%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 118
Parallax 157
138% 148 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 132
Splatting 107
115% 146 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil Z3_128GB 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 46 42 42 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 485
Write 429
Mixed 395
SusWrite 64.6
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 88.6
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 0.5
13% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 87%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB
217GB free
Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 908 898 925 929 882 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 848
Write 865
Mixed 543
SusWrite 901
178% 789 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 47.1
165% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 267
235% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 158%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 218 60 60 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR06BF VG240Y
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-E D4 Builds (Compare 1,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback