Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 21:36
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 206
2-Core 410
118% 231 Pts
4-Core 805
8-Core 1,516
138% 1,160 Pts
64-Core 2,887
179% 2,887 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 302
Reflection 294
Parallax 321
246% 306 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 248
Splatting 183
201% 256 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 205%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1921 1403 1395 1410 1409 1406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 2,076
Mixed 1,704
SusWrite 1,491
398% 1,763 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 67.1
256% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,598
DQ Write 1,331
DQ Mixed 1,486
1,107% 1,471 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 306%
Great: 335%
Kingston SHFR200960G 960GB
372GB free
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 269 203 128 125 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 502
Write 435
Mixed 383
SusWrite 227
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 32.7
127% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 165
160% 253 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 101%
Kingston SHFR200960G 960GB
663GB free
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 370 147 127 165 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 499
Write 437
Mixed 383
SusWrite 236
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 37.3
130% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 162
158% 250 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 101%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
677GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1606 1622 1612 1607 1607 983 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 1,783
Write 1,478
Mixed 1,289
SusWrite 1506
340% 1,514 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 96.5
333% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 1018
DQ Mixed 437
494% 838 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 313%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3466C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 23.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,025
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback