Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 14:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 103
41% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 151
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 235
Sapphire(174B D145) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 103 78 92 81 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 88.9
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.9
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 30 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0C44 SAMSUNG
Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback