Medion Specialist P10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion Specialist P10  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPx0PNP
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 12:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 182
2-Core 364
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1,126
108% 893 Pts
64-Core 1779
110% 1779 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 866C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 126
Parallax 121
106% 126 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 86.4
86% 108 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-B47R 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2411 2644 2730 1584 653 661 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 1,598
Write 2,886
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 1,780
449% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 77.5
318% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,498
DQ Write 1,110
DQ Mixed 1,374
1,008% 1327 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 327%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 37.9
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 40 165 16" 1280 720 AUO9C9F
Typical Specialist P10 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Medion Specialist P10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback