| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 960 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210320 |
| Uptime | 9.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 25 '23 at 00:18 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
96% 180 Pts
|
95% 762 Pts
|
66% 1,062 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.9%
Average
|
44% 60 fps
|
36% 43.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 386 387 391 243 76 MB/s
|
86%
Excellent
|
82% 366 MB/s
|
134% 50.7 MB/s
|
148% 200 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
551GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 171 172 172 171 MB/s
|
96.8%
Outstanding
|
102% 139 MB/s
|
139% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ DDR4 2666 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
79.8%
Very good
|
81% 28.5 GB/s
|
71% 24.8 GB/s
|
51% 78.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 46 | 11 | 144 | 24" | 1280 897 | ACI24A4 VG248 |
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS Builds (Compare 589 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 126x |
| Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 81x |
| Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples | 54x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 59x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 49x |
| RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $367 |