Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 23:21
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 82
2-Core 124
59% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 661
58% 495 Pts
64-Core 1,366
85% 1,366 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 1TB SSD 1TB
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,873
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,205
336% 1,517 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 49.7
159% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 545
415% 564 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 272%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
323GB free
Firmware: AB50
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 142
Write 25.9
Mixed 32.3
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
2GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 9
11% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
130% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAD3200U1816 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1280 720
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback