QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13 GB free of 18 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 61
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
75% 139 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 919
83% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000
Nvidia(10DE 143C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.99
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 108
Parallax 125
101% 119 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 111
Splatting 100
100% 126 fps
Poor: 136%
This bench: 101%
Great: 173%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 351 361 358 360 360 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 18GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 61.1
MC Mixed 37.3
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 29.7" 1920 1017 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback