Lenovo 81F5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81F5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181128
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 19:56
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 83.5
60% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 187
33% 232 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 8
6% 7.17 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.1
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1101 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20210001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1061
Write 1,091
Mixed 598
204% 917 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 32.4
115% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 214
158% 211 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0757
Typical 81F5 Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback