Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M S2H  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 19:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 270
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 814
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A750
Intel(8086 1021) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5084
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 112
Parallax 240
61% 142 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 171
Splatting 226
173% 210 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 512GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,794
Write 479
Mixed 1,087
245% 1,120 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 73.2
246% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 972
672% 856 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 320%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: JA0OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 157
Write 30.2
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 30.6
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 DDR4 3200 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 27.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 28.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 75 21.5" 1280 720 AUS22A1 ASUS VP228
Typical GA-A520M S2H Builds (Compare 1,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback