OEM X79G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardOEM X79G  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 19:27
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 702
65% 541 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 28.6
26% 32 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 26.7
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2053 2126 2140 2148 2173 2157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,943
Write 2,205
Mixed 2,028
SusWrite 2,133
470% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 65.9
203% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 480
348% 457 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 292%
Great: 591%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
749GB free
Firmware: Z1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 456 457 455 456 454 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 148
Write 65.4
Mixed 34
SusWrite 399
37% 162 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 10.2
40% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 12.8
10% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 102%
ST1000DM 003-1SB102 1TB
295GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 61.7
Write 16.7
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 27.6
39% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
50% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 18.4" 1280 720 GSM4BAE W1943
Typical X79G Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: OEM X79G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback