HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8265
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-9600 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 43
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 113
41% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 182
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8265) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 12.1
7% 10.3 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 8.9
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13241
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 336 328 322 349 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 384
Write 330
Mixed 369
SusWrite 334
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 27.8
99% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 86.7
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 136
105% 138 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
465GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 102 107 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 97.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 104
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24.1" 1280 720 FUS0854 B24W-7 LED
Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback