PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121219 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 24 '23 at 18:55 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD 128GB 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 21 43 30 73 30 MB/s
|
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
64GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 83 83 87 MB/s
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 21.7" | 1280 720 | GSM5B34 MP59G |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 49x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 33x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 33x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 50x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 26x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |