Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-1TM (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '23 at 17:10
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2328M 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Memory 73 1-Core 54.4 2-Core 91.6 47% 73 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 123 15% 117 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600 2,324 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 3.5 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 3 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 284 281 280 271 224 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 338 Write 327 Mixed 235 SusWrite 271 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 27.7 89% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 200 153% 209 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 12.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	15.5"	1280 720	SEC3150

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM