Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 2 months ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '23 at 12:55
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR) 12,273 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 22.7 1-Core 39.3 2-Core 83.2 26% 48.4 Pts	4-Core 99.9 8-Core 150 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 176 Parallax 168 131% 168 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 167 Splatting 119 111% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKT1.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 289 Write 249 Mixed 205 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 14.2 55% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 153 113% 152 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 195GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 123 125 126 125 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 102 Write 183 Mixed 40 SusWrite 122 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR2666D464L19/16G 1x16GB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.2 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 5.1 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 287 14% 287 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	49	60	23.7"	1280 720	XMI23C3 Mi Monitor

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	334x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	284x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	226x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	164x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16