Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3687U 2,933 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 128 57% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 157 23% 166 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 0004) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.7 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 4 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF256GMCS 256GB 846 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSTAN103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 210 213 264 360 313 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 347 Write 157 Mixed 264 SusWrite 266 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 21.4 64% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 138 118% 178 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.3% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 12.1 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.1 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	14"	1280 720	TOS5091 Internal LCD

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	154x

SSD
THNSNF128GMCS 128GBToshibaBench 64%, 1,277 samples	40x
THNSNF256GMCS 256GBToshibaBench 63%, 846 samples	38x
THNSNS Series mSATA PCI-E 128GB ToshibaBench 67%, 614 samples	20x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16