HP 700-515xt

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 700-515xt (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150520
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '23 at 23:46
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 190 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 488 52% 415 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% XFX(1682 9390) CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.4% Average	Lighting 62.3 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 85.1 51% 73.5 fps	MRender 62.2 Gravity 58.2 Splatting 44.4 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 190117O4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 413 349 129 129 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 426 Write 401 Mixed 366 SusWrite 256 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 36.9 132% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 234 177% 234 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 572GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 157 156 157 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 156 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 157 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 4,871 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 17.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	38	60	23"	1280 720	DELF04C DELL E2314H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-515xt Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP 700-515xt

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	19x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	14x
Core i7-4771Intel $129Bench 73%, 11,180 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	12x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	5x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	5x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	2x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,401 samples	5x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 29%, 7,106 samples	3x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16