AZW SEi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAZW SEi  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SEi
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 23:40
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8109U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 200
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 12.1
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 0.2
5% 7.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-A01 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1078 345 313 327 329 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,245
Write 1157
Mixed 1,111
SusWrite 453
222% 991 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 58.2
193% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 559
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 496
365% 483 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 159%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 17.8
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7016 SAMSUNG
Typical SEi Builds (Compare 724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW SEi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback