Gigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 20:00
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 655
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 134
Parallax 124
97% 126 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 129
Splatting 113
96% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0121AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 120 52 38 51 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 433
Write 408
Mixed 331
SusWrite 72.2
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 34.7
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 236
186% 257 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 92%
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
166GB free
Firmware: P0121AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 53 54 54 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 435
Write 335
Mixed 355
SusWrite 85.1
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 29.6
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 240
192% 268 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 92%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
993GB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 109 112 113 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 175
Write 181
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 113
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 173 174 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 162
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 173
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1B1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 37.2
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 42 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27A7 ASUS MG279
Typical GA-X99-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $839
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback