MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive398% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D67
MotherboardMSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)  (all builds)
Memory111.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 214
2-Core 425
121% 238 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,622
144% 1,222 Pts
64-Core 3,718
230% 3,718 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
Intel(8086 1020) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.2% Good
Lighting 80.5
Reflection 141
Parallax 206
66% 142 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
56% 81.1 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 121%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
548GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4004 3956 2673 1653 1713 1673 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 2,138
Write 4,076
Mixed 3,333
SusWrite 2,612
692% 3,040 MB/s
4K Read 76.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 99.9
334% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 1,034
DQ Mixed 1,139
848% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 398%
Great: 592%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
498GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1321 1321 1330 1328 1329 1305 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,094
Write 1329
Mixed 1,295
SusWrite 1,322
337% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 43.8
206% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 989
DQ Mixed 558
512% 777 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 265%
Great: 352%
Samsung MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: GDC7302Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2049 2049 2047 2049 2048 2049 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 2,723
Write 2,050
Mixed 2297
SusWrite 2,048
512% 2,280 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 80.2
289% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,403
DQ Write 1,232
DQ Mixed 1,320
989% 1,318 MB/s
Poor: 304%
This bench: 382%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 168 168 169 167 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 100
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 166
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 242 242 243 241 245 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-32 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 42
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 49
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 44.3
132% 46.2 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 122%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0A0 LG TV
Typical PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67) Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback