Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 154
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 235
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 63
Parallax 87.3
52% 71.5 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 45.7
48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed K7-256G-CD 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 79 20 14 23 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 450
Write 321
Mixed 332
SusWrite 63.1
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 23.8
119% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 38.6
79% 154 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 76%
SSD 240GB 240GB
146GB free
Firmware: FW210311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 347 383 349 53 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 438
Write 367
Mixed 335
SusWrite 254
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 12.4
105% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 17
74% 163 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4SFS826A.C8FADP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 29.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 212 59 75 21.5" 1920 1080 AOC2260 2260WG5
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback