Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '23 at 17:23
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 235 74% 138 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 600 65% 515 Pts	64-Core 627 39% 627 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37AD) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 114 Parallax 98.7 88% 107 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 96.4 Splatting 105 93% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S3+ 480GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQKA.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 23 22 21 25 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 322 Write 358 Mixed 286 SusWrite 59.6 58% 256 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 27.5 105% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 167 156% 238 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 100%
WD WD10JUCX-63WPNY0 1TB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 77GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 78 77 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 84.3 Write 93.7 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 76.7 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 1x16GB 747 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 11 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	28	144	23.8"	1280 720	AUS2421 ASUS VG249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	301x
Core i5-8400Intel $130Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	157x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	124x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	81x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	72x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	72x

SSD
BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP250CM30001 250GBSeagateBench 150%, 932 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 630 samples	88x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	58x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $212

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16