MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive433% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 14:52
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 331
105% 196 Pts
4-Core 668
8-Core 1,125
109% 896 Pts
64-Core 1,411
87% 1,411 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 274
Reflection 250
Parallax 282
223% 268 fps
MRender 307
Gravity 228
Splatting 164
183% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4240 4303 2352 1535 1510 1561 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
433% Outstanding
Read 2621
Write 4,497
Mixed 2,963
SusWrite 2,584
718% 3,166 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 109
365% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,487
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 1,315
973% 1,291 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 433%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
416GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 459 459 459 459 459 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 449
Mixed 417
SusWrite 458
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 47.4
164% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 219
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
Fanxiang S660 1TB
705GB free
Firmware: 1.W.8.R2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4146 4149 4150 4148 4155 3387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 2,967
Write 4,331
Mixed 2,579
SusWrite 4,022
788% 3,475 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 59.8
279% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 92
DQ Write 1,141
DQ Mixed 167
263% 467 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 475%
Great: 502%
Asgard AN1TNVMe-M.2/80 1TB
764GB free
Firmware: S0614C0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 1393 1400 1399 1398 1229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,487
Write 1372
Mixed 953
SusWrite 1,366
291% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 39.7
222% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 541
489% 741 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 245%
Great: 254%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
448GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 84 82 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 86.8
Write 55.7
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 82.9
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z3600C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 39.3
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 28.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 100 34" 1280 720 MSI3DB6 MSI MAG342CQR
Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,017
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback