User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X79
Memory27.7 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 146
58% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 510
47% 392 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.6% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 57.6
Parallax 59.2
31% 51.4 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 42.2
40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Huananzhi 512G 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 893 880 878 875 875 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,332
Write 867
Mixed 906
SusWrite 880
223% 996 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 21
99% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 43.1
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 15.6
53% 108 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 143%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 24" 1920 1057 ACR041C Acer XB240H A
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback