Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 13:54
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 141
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 448
42% 348 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 111
Parallax 98.7
78% 102 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 96
Splatting 87.5
76% 93.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 306 330 349 339 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 357
Write 338
Mixed 244
SusWrite 313
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 32.4
106% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 108
112% 183 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600G 04CB DDR3 1600G 04CB DDR3 1600G 04CB DDR3 1600G 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR071D Acer R240Y
Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback