DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	17.2 GB free of 15 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '23 at 22:05
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 86.3 46% 69.6 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 139 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Lighting 72 Reflection 73 Parallax 67 59% 70.7 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 66.3 56% 68 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 2,882 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 172 226 228 233 231 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.5% Above average	Read 241 Write 233 Mixed 182 SusWrite 200 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 22.2 76% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 166 129% 178 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 15GB 1,040 User benchmarks, average bench 47% null MHz 1024, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 10.5 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	24.1"	1280 720	LEN1144 LEN LT2452pwC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	317x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	20x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	20x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	15x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16