Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B365M-A (all builds)
Memory	20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '23 at 21:37
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 392 50% 380 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1997 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.5% Very good	Lighting 98.4 Reflection 106 Parallax 98.1 80% 101 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 97.5 Splatting 94.8 78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 54,201 User benchmarks, average bench 449% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,453 Write 2302 Mixed 2,057 506% 2,271 MB/s	4K Read 57.8 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 63.6 228% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,125 DQ Write 704 DQ Mixed 884 667% 904 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB 2,443 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 298GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 371 371 362 372 371 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 322 Write 363 Mixed 330 SusWrite 369 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 25.7 83% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 192 141% 185 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 24GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	78.5% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 26.8 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 24.3 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	32"	1280 720	OOO0001 EM3FPAC32BC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,629x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	480x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	419x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	358x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	341x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	275x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	132x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	105x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	237x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16