Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E559

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E559 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB2CA
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	8.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '23 at 21:24
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8665U 10,156 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 147 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 280 32% 252 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1E26 0023) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.52% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 4.9 4% 4.9 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 6.7 5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV512TDL-1AW15ABFA 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 297GB free (System drive) Firmware: M5MA000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 225 310 271 271 224 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 361 Write 318 Mixed 303 SusWrite 265 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 23.3 76% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 261 197% 262 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB 33,430 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.1% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 25: 0P 3R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
25%	7%	97	32	2	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD04A7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK E559 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E559

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	22x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	6x
Core i7-8665UIntelBench 60%, 10,156 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	33x

SSD
MTFDDAV512TDL-1AW15ABFA 512GBCrucialBench 84%, 25 samples	6x
MZVLB512HAJQ-00007 512GBSamsungBench 236%, 335 samples	5x
PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G-1016 512GBWDCBench 222%, 27 samples	4x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	12x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	4x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16