Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 21:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 112
45% 76 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 344
33% 272 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.19
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 50.9
42% 54.1 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 47.4
42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 110 107 97 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 98.5
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
136% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 35.1
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 SPT09AB Sceptre F24
Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback