Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 833
74% 627 Pts
64-Core 1982
123% 1982 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2879 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 195
Parallax 206
145% 193 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 183
Splatting 128
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
532GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1874 1952 1894 1930 1988 1996 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 1,497
Write 1216
Mixed 852
SusWrite 1939
310% 1376 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 60.1
236% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,200
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1028
781% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 298%
Great: 363%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 802 800 805 801 806 799 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 802
Mixed 575
SusWrite 802
150% 661 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 32.2
113% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 598
456% 614 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 130%
Great: 354%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
934GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 1254 1255 1254 1256 1278 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1838
Write 988
Mixed 860
SusWrite 1274
276% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 49.1
175% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,175
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 1,020
771% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 252%
Great: 363%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 79.9
MC Write 75.1
MC Mixed 67.7
212% 74.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 182%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 265%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback