Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LHB
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 595
55% 460 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 170D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 50.2
45% 60 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 43
42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
153GB free
Firmware: VC2S038D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1105 1151 457 69 74 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,183
Write 1,021
Mixed 934
SusWrite 489
203% 907 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 46.2
144% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 488
391% 534 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 147%
Great: 291%
PNY 960GB SATA SSD 960GB
570GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 375 391 426 426 427 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 461
Write 409
Mixed 388
SusWrite 398
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 27.3
114% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 38.7
90% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 105%
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,226
Write 620
Mixed 58.7
206% 968 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 27.7
130% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 433
DQ Write 31.7
DQ Mixed 53.6
84% 173 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB Builds (Compare 1,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback