Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 18:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 309
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128gb SSD 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 391 397 337 341 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 390
Write 371
Mixed 299
SusWrite 322
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 12.6
91% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 16.4
67% 144 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 152%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 136 136 136 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
231GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 125 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 126
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 126
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 187 23 60 0" 1280 720
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback