Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Default string (all builds)
Motherboard	Default Default string
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '23 at 17:52
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4115 544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 30.7 1-Core 54.1 2-Core 108 35% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 138 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 0.2 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB 2,573 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 436 Write 386 Mixed 351 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 20.6 84% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 38 70% 138 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 95%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 6GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 29.6 Write 5 Mixed 5.7 12% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 31% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 246 16% 246 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	42	29	0	13.9"	1280 720	MS_0003

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Default string

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	1,019x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples	959x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	906x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	487x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	460x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	331x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	173x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	150x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,368x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	489x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16