Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 17:43
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 172
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 256
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 14.1
12% 13 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 15.2
11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 141 119 68 67 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.4% Above average
Read 233
Write 174
Mixed 196
SusWrite 102
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 30.3
111% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 23.4
46% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/8G 1302 PSD38G13332 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 111 58 60 21.7" 1920 1017 GSM5AB7 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical GA-H81M-S2V Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback