Acer Aspire XC-830

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive10.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-830  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-830
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Relative performance (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 19.8
2-Core 40.9
14% 30.4 Pts
4-Core 66.6
8-Core 71.2
9% 68.9 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 68 79 65 71 73 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.8% Very poor
Read 81.4
Write 70.8
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 62.1
17% 76 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3
12% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC4R1-BUNS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.43 GB/s
Latency 547
7% 547 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 7 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Aspire XC-830 Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-830

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback