Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 10:32
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 447
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 90.9
Reflection 89
Parallax 84.9
74% 88.3 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 70.8
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM960HMJP-00005 960GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXT5404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 241 244 247 247 248 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.3% Very good
Read 260
Write 245
Mixed 231
SusWrite 243
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 36.3
123% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 195
147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 119%
Intel SSDSC2KB960G7 960GB
154GB free
Firmware: SCV10150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 238 239 242 242 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 200
Write 242
Mixed 216
SusWrite 239
51% 224 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 25.5
92% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 192
143% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 90%
Intel SSDSC2KB960G7 960GB
165GB free
Firmware: SCV10150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 433 434 440 443 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 309
Write 438
Mixed 336
SusWrite 434
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 27.1
99% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 258
207% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
110GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 39.3
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 19.2
25% 33 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100M 1TB
9GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 57.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 19.2
38% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 99U5471-031.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 VES3700 43UHD_LCD_TV
Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback