PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3646h |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151014 |
Uptime | 7.7 Days |
Run Date | Dec 22 '23 at 07:23 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 21 15 64 14 68 MB/s
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 125 121 119 120 MB/s
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
210GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 95 93 94 94 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 65 | 48 | 60 | 23" | 1280 720 | PHLC039 Philips 231E |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 227x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 49x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 37x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 231x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 62x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 32x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 23x |
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples | 10x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $119 |