Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JF
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 00:51
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 127
49% 85 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 243
28% 221 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1EFF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4629
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 11
Parallax 12.5
10% 12 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 9.3
9% 11.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPT256L2-2IAS7G2 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0901A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,428
Write 1,034
Mixed 886
247% 1,116 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 22.9
121% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 575
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 517
368% 475 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 222%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
818GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 112 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 66.6
Write 108
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 111
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WHS84S8AZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback