Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 252%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 250%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 22:17
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 171
2-Core 341
107% 201 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1077
105% 861 Pts
64-Core 1,573
97% 1,573 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 363
Reflection 351
Parallax 377
296% 364 fps
MRender 488
Gravity 301
Splatting 216
260% 335 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 247%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 790 789 779 778 776 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,665
Write 2,556
Mixed 1,925
SusWrite 790
444% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 96
330% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,449
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 1,248
944% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 314%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
475GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1731 1837 1592 1436 1438 1439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 1,799
Mixed 1747
SusWrite 1,579
429% 1,916 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 94.1
313% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,508
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 1,327
999% 1,343 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 355%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
899GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 463 462 461 460 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 445
Mixed 452
SusWrite 460
104% 459 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 58.8
196% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 139 139 139 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 144
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 138
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.5
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 35.6
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 38 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback