Asus GL702VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus GL702VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '23 at 17:03
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 161 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 474 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 57.3 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 58.8 47% 61.4 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 60.8 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30100P10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 394 Write 248 Mixed 206 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 21.4 91% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 159 147% 230 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 83%
ROG ESD-S1CL 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 688 646 643 726 720 732 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 246GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 95 95 90 91 92 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 110 Write 99.3 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 91.3 58% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 8,819 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.5 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.7 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	27"	1280 720	AUS2724 XG27WQ

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	414x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	441x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	93x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	43x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	18x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	146x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	32x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16