MSI MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 223%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D15
MotherboardMSI MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 09:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,187
106% 894 Pts
64-Core 1,977
122% 1,977 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Zotac(19DA 3612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4817 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Lighting 298
Reflection 270
Parallax 341
242% 303 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 252
Splatting 185
200% 254 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 203%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001CBN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 300 49 124 134 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 374
Write 334
Mixed 286
SusWrite 161
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 35
122% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 133
114% 163 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4K3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 27.4
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 32.1
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 31.5" 1280 720 GSM772A LG QHD
Typical MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15) Builds (Compare 2,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback