Asus PRIME A520M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 08:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 176
2-Core 342
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,175
108% 907 Pts
64-Core 1,488
92% 1,488 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 38.7
31% 39.3 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-create T253TA001T 1TB
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 153 20 58 8.1 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 504
Write 454
Mixed 426
SusWrite 121
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 31.9
147% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 46.8
97% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRX2666D464L16/16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.1% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 26
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 28.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA0BA DELL U2415
Typical PRIME A520M-A Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback