MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star H310 Gaming Infinite (MS-B915)
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 116
2-Core 235
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 616
69% 541 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
53% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 61.9
53% 64.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 61.9
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-256G-1036 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 535 501 497 503 424 370 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,049
Write 1,009
Mixed 960
SusWrite 472
196% 872 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 49.7
166% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 876
673% 919 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 164%
Great: 202%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
344GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 199 200 274 306 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 306
Write 110
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 248
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 10.4
48% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 17.3
13% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 206 207 273 304 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 431
Write 362
Mixed 353
SusWrite 250
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 26.2
111% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 47.9
104% 211 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 158 160 161 163 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 147
Write 152
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 159
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 108%
ASMT 2115 240GB
223GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 302 295 127 78 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 330
Write 243
Mixed 282
SusWrite 196
344% 263 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 11.4
1,181% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 37.8
DQ Mixed 15.9
1,901% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 161%
Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 144 23.8" 1920 1009 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback