MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 23:35
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$162
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 346
106% 200 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,032
98% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 1040 172 65 98 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,842
Write 2259
Mixed 1,707
SusWrite 312
343% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.7
222% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1321
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 94.3
354% 793 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 211%
Great: 348%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
71GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 268 270 268 261 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 430
Write 271
Mixed 304
SusWrite 267
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 32.2
116% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 189
170% 259 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3733 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 39
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 0R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 12% 56 91 59 144 0" 1280 720
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 6,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback