Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 283
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 1,043
93% 787 Pts
64-Core 2,103
130% 2,103 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 150
Parallax 146
120% 148 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 130
Splatting 118
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,443
Write 2,195
Mixed 1,461
451% 2,033 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 81.5
246% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 833
623% 837 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
9GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 412
Write 404
Mixed 366
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 45.8
148% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 206
155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 118%
WDC WDBA3V0020BNC-WRSN 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1812 1375 743 746 751 756 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,218
Write 1,557
Mixed 1,192
SusWrite 1,030
282% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 59.1
235% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 594
523% 790 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 223%
Great: 282%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
134GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 152 158 162 171 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 118
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 155
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 112%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 216 221 215 220 229 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 191
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 221
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 1.6
358% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 36.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 32.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 2R 7G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 6% 18 218 60 60 27" 1280 720 DELD066 DELL U2715H
History: Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B | Score 33: 0P 2R 7G 2B
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback