Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 22:42
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 41.5
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 43.9
24% 35.4 Pts
4-Core 61.9
8-Core 83.6
9% 72.8 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 5.8 7 34 46 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 307
Write 8.7
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 33
19% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
214GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 50 60 88 104 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 158
Write 29.4
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 73.8
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 109%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
296GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 50 58 86 101 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905474-019.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.1
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22FC ASUS VH228
Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback