Lenovo 21HK000QMX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 21HK000QMX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21HK000QMX
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 22:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 61.2
1-Core 161
2-Core 347
96% 190 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 757
81% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 2313) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 27.1
17% 26 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 31
Splatting 22.2
21% 26.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HDLU-00BLL 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L2QGXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 1219 1233 1789 2059 1928 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,405
Write 1,966
Mixed 1,871
SusWrite 1,545
437% 1,947 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 52.9
213% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 553
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 460
324% 418 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 273%
Great: 438%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 54.4
MC Mixed 48.2
139% 48.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 26.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 127%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 11% 57 189 8 60 16" 1536 960 LEN41B7
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback