HP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A20
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220915
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 20:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 56.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 255
81% 153 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 534
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A20) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 15
10% 15.2 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 13.3
12% 15.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 572 291 342 350 344 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,076
Write 847
Mixed 746
SusWrite 441
174% 778 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 44.1
155% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 565
412% 555 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 142%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD416G32002S 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 32.4
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 23.3
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 8 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO499F
Typical Laptop 15s-fq5xxx Builds (Compare 1,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback