HP EliteBook 840 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 19:03
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 92.3
40% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 182
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.3
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM871b M.2 2280 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT23D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 295 307 302 310 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 398
Write 297
Mixed 315
SusWrite 300
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 29.4
87% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 313
239% 324 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.8% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 63 21 0 13.9" 1280 720 AUO123D
Typical EliteBook 840 G3 Builds (Compare 5,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback