Notebook PB50_70DFx,DDx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook PB50_70DFx,DDx  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook PB50_70DFx,DDx
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 17:23
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 145
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 317
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67E3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 125
Parallax 114
92% 117 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 95.8
92% 116 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
712GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,312
Write 1,844
Mixed 1,654
430% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 58.6
192% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 380
290% 398 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Sabrent Rocket Q 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,292
Write 1,974
Mixed 1,425
352% 1,564 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 49.6
158% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 442
332% 452 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 403%
Lacie P9227 Mobile 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.7
Write 84
Mixed 65.7
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 67%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.2
Write 81
Mixed 68
57% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 67%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
663GB free
Firmware: 0004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.7
Write 93.7
Mixed 72.4
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
190% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
Lacie Mobile Drive 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 76.9
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
167% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0304
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.6
Write 75.5
Mixed 63.9
58% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO432F82-3200E 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO409D
Typical PB50_70DFx,DDx Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: Notebook PB50_70DFx,DDx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback