Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 16:40
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 332
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5830
XFX(1682 3070) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 16.5
14% 15.6 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 9.8
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Storfly VSFB25XC030G-150 30GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0115-000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 251
Write 216
Mixed 225
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 28.4
93% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 166
129% 177 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 0" 1920 1080 CVT0000
Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback